The carbon market in Madagascar



STEPS | FUNDING

REDD+ Carbon Credits in Madagascar: Promise and Controversy

The international market for forest carbon has emerged as a potential new source of funding for conservation and community-based sustainable development initiatives in Madagascar. In the first eight months of 2008 alone, three "avoided deforestation" and reforestation deals were announced, with more projects in the pipeline. However, despite early optimism, REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) carbon credits have faced significant challenges, and the market has so far failed to deliver on promises to provide sufficient financing to protect and restore Madagascar’s forests.

The REDD+ Concept

REDD+ is a global mechanism designed to reward tropical countries with carbon credits for preserving their forests. Deforestation contributes nearly 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions—more than the entire transportation sector—making forest conservation a cost-effective way to slow climate change. Under REDD+, countries like Madagascar can receive payments for reducing deforestation and forest degradation while promoting reforestation and sustainable land management.

In theory, REDD+ offers a win-win scenario: industrialized nations and corporations offset their emissions while developing countries receive financial incentives to conserve forests. By monetizing carbon storage, REDD+ aims to transform forests into valuable assets rather than land awaiting agricultural conversion.

Challenges in Implementation

Despite its promise, REDD+ has struggled to generate substantial and reliable financial flows. Madagascar’s forest conservation programs remain chronically underfunded, and carbon finance has not provided the level of support needed to protect its forests at scale. Several factors contribute to this shortfall:

  • Volatile Carbon Markets: The price of forest carbon credits has fluctuated widely, making it difficult for conservation projects to secure long-term financial stability.
  • Bureaucratic and Technical Barriers: The process of verifying emissions reductions and securing REDD+ funding is complex, requiring detailed monitoring, reporting, and compliance with international standards.
  • Equity and Land Rights Concerns: Local communities, particularly indigenous groups, often receive little benefit from REDD+ projects. There are ongoing disputes over land tenure, with some communities excluded from decision-making processes.
  • Leakage and Enforcement Issues: Preventing deforestation in one area does not always stop it elsewhere. Without strong governance and enforcement, deforestation may simply shift to unprotected regions.

Controversies and Criticism

REDD+ has been criticized for failing to deliver meaningful benefits to local communities. Many projects are designed with little input from indigenous groups and fail to address the underlying drivers of deforestation, such as poverty and land-use pressures. In some cases, forest-dependent communities have even been displaced to make way for conservation projects, raising ethical concerns about the program’s social impact.

Another major issue is the role of corporate actors in the carbon market. While REDD+ was intended as a tool for climate mitigation, some critics argue that it has become a way for polluters to "buy" emissions reductions rather than reducing their own carbon output. This raises concerns about whether REDD+ is genuinely contributing to emissions reductions or simply enabling business-as-usual practices.

The Path Forward

For REDD+ to succeed in Madagascar, key reforms are needed. Projects must prioritize local community engagement and ensure that benefits are equitably distributed. Strengthening land tenure rights and improving transparency in carbon finance transactions can help build trust and effectiveness.

Moreover, REDD+ should be part of a broader strategy that includes sustainable agriculture, alternative livelihoods, and robust legal protections for forests. Relying on carbon markets alone is unlikely to provide the financial security necessary for long-term conservation.

Despite its flaws, REDD+ remains one of the few large-scale mechanisms available for financing tropical forest conservation. If properly reformed, it could still play a role in protecting Madagascar’s unique ecosystems. However, until the market stabilizes and governance issues are addressed, REDD+ will continue to fall short of its promise to safeguard Madagascar’s forests for future generations.



<< Previous | Index >>

Conservation index